According to a note to correspondents According to UN spokesperson Stéphane Dujarric, the incident occurred during a patrol of the UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) was inspecting a roadblock in the village of Bastarra, southern Lebanon.

THE Blue lineestablished by the United Nations, extends approximately 120 kilometers along Lebanon’s southern border and serves as a “withdrawal line” to confirm Israel’s withdrawal from southern Lebanon.

In a separate incident on the same day, another UNIFIL patrol reported machine gun fire coming from south of the Blue Line, in the immediate vicinity of its position, near the village of Kfar Shouba.

“UNIFIL had informed the Israel Defense Forces in advance of activities in these areas, in accordance with the usual practice of patrolling sensitive areas near the Blue Line,” Mr. Dujarric said.

He noted that in recent days, incidents restricting UNIFIL’s movements by local individuals have also taken place in the Mission’s area of ​​operations.

“Any act that could endanger the safety and security of United Nations peacekeepers is completely unacceptable,” Mr. Dujarric said.

“We reiterate our call to all actors to cease activities that endanger the well-being of peacekeepers and that interfere with their mandated activities in support of the implementation of the Security Council resolution 1701“, he added.

The UN spokesperson further reminded the parties of their responsibility to ensure the safety and security of peacekeepers.

This call follows a peace initiative presented by the transitional Prime Minister of Sudan during a Security Council meeting earlier this week.

UN Secretary-General António Guterres “takes note of the peace initiative,” its spokesperson said on Friday, stressing that “the search for lasting and inclusive peace is essential as the conflict enters a new year.»

He called on the parties to agree on an immediate cessation of hostilities and work towards a lasting ceasefire that preserves the unity and territorial integrity of Sudan, urging Sudanese actors to “prioritize compromise and articulate a shared vision for a civilian-led transition.»

The Secretary General Personal envoy for SudanRamtane Lamamra, remains ready to advance consultations with both parties to help ensure an inclusive and lasting resolution, complementing the ongoing efforts of Member States and regional partners.

Peacekeepers withdraw after deadly attack

The peace effort comes against a backdrop of serious security setbacks on the ground.

This weekend, the UN peacekeeping mission in Abyei oil region – which straddles Sudan and South Sudan – has completed the evacuation of its logistics base in Kadugli, South Kordofan, ending nearly 13 years of operations at the site.

The withdrawal followed drone attacks on December 13 that killed six Bangladeshi peacekeepers and seriously injured nine other people. The remains of those killed have been repatriated, while eight of the injured are being treated in Kenya.

The Kadugli base served as the headquarters of the Joint Border Verification and Monitoring Mechanism (JVMM), which monitors a demilitarized and secure border zone established by Sudan and South Sudan in 2012.

UNISFA continues to operate from other locations, including Tishwin and Abu Qussa.

Humanitarian needs are increasing

Beyond the battlefield, humanitarian needs continue to increase.

A recent UN-led assessment shows that female-headed households face increased vulnerability across Sudan, including reduced access to cash, education and water services, and greater exposure to displacement and protection risks.

At Monday’s Security Council meeting, senior UN officials warned that intensified fighting – particularly in Kordofan and Darfur – has led to massive displacementdisrupted access to aid and worsened already catastrophic conditions for civilians.

In its third year, the war between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) has precipitated one of the world’s worst humanitarian crises, killing thousands of civilians, displacing millions and triggering famine conditions in several regions.

The UN agency has revealed shocking figures linked to attacks on health facilities in Sudan, highlighting that the country records the highest percentage of deaths in the world linked to attacks on the health sector, in blatant violation of international humanitarian law.

In a conversation with Abdelmonem Makki from UN NewsShible Sahbani, WHO Representative in Sudan, explains the seriousness of the situation and how the organization is supporting the country’s health authorities and citizens.

Shible Sahbani: The war started in April 2023, which means that in a few days it will have lasted 1,000 days. During this period, the country was plunged into a rapidly deteriorating humanitarian situation, a security crisis, a displacement crisis, a famine-type crisis, but also a health crisis.

The climate and conditions in Sudan are conducive to the spread of malaria and dengue fever by mosquitoes. Outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases, such as measles and polio, are also currently being reported in many states.

Health facilities are under attack, there is a shortage of medicines and supplies, and a lack of financial and human resources to operate health services. This means that the system is on the verge of collapse.

Sudan was once considered the breadbasket of the entire region. Today, the country faces one of the most serious food crises in the world: more than 21 million people face high levels of acute malnutrition and food insecurity. Children under five and pregnant or breastfeeding women are particularly at risk: it is estimated that nearly 800,000 children under five will have suffered from severe acute malnutrition in 2025.

UN News: How is WHO supporting Sudanese health authorities?

Shible Sahbani: The World Health Organization (WHO) is responsible for coordinating the health response, in collaboration with the Ministry of Health and other partners. We provide expertise and technical support, as well as capacity building to respond to epidemics, malnutrition, non-communicable diseases and mental health needs. Since the start of the war, WHO has provided approximately 3,000 tons of medical supplies, worth approximately $33.3 million. We also provided cash assistance to health workers who were not receiving salaries, as well as fuel to generate electricity in health facilities.

UN Info: According to UNICEFVaccination rates in Sudan have fallen to their lowest level in 40 years and thousands of children have not received vaccine doses. What dangers does this pose for the children of Sudan?

Shible Sahbani: This reduction in vaccination coverage is one of the main reasons why vaccine-preventable diseases, such as measles, diphtheria and polio, are spreading across the country. Malnutrition and other health problems also make children less immune, putting their lives and futures at serious risk.

UN News: Can we avoid a further worsening of the health crisis?

Shible Sahbani: We must view Sudan as a country that must recover as quickly as possible. Sudan is a large country with a high population density and has immediate needs. But we also need to strengthen the health system. In this regard, we are working with the government to develop a new strategy for rapid recovery and development and to build resilience.

The eastern part of the country remained stable and was not directly affected by the war. But the massive influx of displaced people from other states has placed a huge burden on health facilities.

The western part – particularly Kordofan and Darfur – is where populations are bombarded and face serious security problems and serious difficulties in accessing health services. The central region, which includes Al-Jazeera, Khartoum and Sennar, was hit hard by the war but is now accessible.

Thursday, the UN and Iraq sign a new agreement, the Sustainable Development Cooperation Framework for 2025 to 2029, to help the country progress towards its national goals, which are also reflected in the Sustainable development agenda for 2030 adopted by Member States in 2015.

The agreement comes before the closure of the United Nations Assistance Mission for Iraq (MANUI), which has been assisting the government on key policy issues for over two decades.

“The signing of the Framework Agreement constitutes a natural and honorable transition in relations between the United Nations and the Republic of Iraq,” declared MANUI Chief Mohamed Al Hassan. “This reflects an orderly and responsible transition from supporting political stability to the stage of consolidating the sustainable development partnership between Iraq and the organization. »

Listen to our interview with Mr. Al Hassan on the closure of UNAMI.

About the frame

In order to reach the 2030 Agendawhich also includes the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), countries must not only work collectively, but also do their part at the national level.

Cooperation frameworks for sustainable development There are agreements between the UN and individual governments that give countries the tools to achieve these goals, from planning to implementation and monitoring.

The plan for Iraq focuses on four main strategic priorities that align with the country’s national development plan:

1. Improved access to education, health and social services.
2. Create opportunities for employment and economic growth.
3. Protect the environment and fight climate change.
4. Strengthen the rule of law and good governance.

How will we achieve this?

Implementation, monitoring and reporting of the UN-Iraq Development Framework will be guided by a steering committee co-chaired by the Iraqi Ministry of Planning and the UN Resident Coordinator who leads the country team.

Government institutions and UN agencies will come together to assess progress each year and ensure the framework remains on track.

Implementation will be supported by a dedicated fund, alongside a strategy to mobilize resources for the necessary financing.

Closure of the UN mission

MANUI was created in 2003 following the fall of Saddam Hussein and supported Iraq throughout the political transition, post-conflict recovery and fight against ISIL, also known as Daesh. The special political mission ends its mandate on December 31.

With the country now much more stable than it was twenty years ago, Iraq is striving to acquire greater autonomy.

“Iraq believes that it is ready to move to another phase, consolidating its sovereignty and territorial integrity,” Mr. Al Hassan said. said previously UN News. “I believe wholeheartedly that Iraq is ready for this.”

At least eight people were killed and 18 others injured in the explosion at the Ali Bin Abi Talib mosque – a place of worship for the minority Alawite community – in the Wadi al-Dahab neighborhood.

Syria has been on a path to political transition since the toppling of the Assad regime last December, but continues to face sectarian and other violence.

A group called Saraya Ansar al-Sunna claimed responsibility, according to media reports.

Call for justice

“The Secretary-General reiterates that attacks on civilians and places of worship are unacceptable. He emphasizes that those responsible must be identified and brought to justice,” he added. statement said.

It also “notes that the Syrian authorities have condemned the attack and reaffirmed the State’s commitment to fighting terrorism and holding its perpetrators accountable.”

The UN chief expressed his condolences to the families of those killed and wished the injured a speedy and full recovery, the statement concluded.

The United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Volker Türk, echoed this message in Geneva earlier this year and posed a question to the Human Rights Council:

“Are we taking the necessary measures to protect people from climate chaos, safeguard their future and manage natural resources in a way that respects human rights and the environment?

His answer was very simple: we are not doing enough.

In this regard, the impacts of climate change must be understood not only as a climate emergency, but also as a violation of human rights, said Professor Joyeeta Gupta. UN News recently

She is co-chair of the international scientific advisory body Earth Commission and one of the the UN high-level representatives for science, technology and innovation for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

Who suffers the most?

Professor Gupta said that the 1992 climate convention never quantified human harm.

She noted that when the Paris agreement was adopted in 2015, the global consensus settled on limiting warming to 2° Celsius, later recognizing 1.5° Celsius as a safer target.

But for small island states, even that was a compromise forced by the imbalance of power, and “for them, two degrees was not viable,” Professor Gupta said.

“Rising seas, saltwater intrusion and extreme storms threaten to wipe out entire nations. When rich countries demanded scientific proof, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was tasked with studying the difference between 1.5° Celsius and 2° Celsius,” she continued.

She said the results were clear: 1.5° Celsius is significantly less destructive but still dangerous.

In his own research published in NatureShe says one degree Celsius is the right limit, because beyond that point, the impacts of climate change violate the rights of more than 1% of the world’s population, or around 100 million people.

The tragedy, she stressed, is that the planet crossed one degree in 2017 and will likely exceed 1.5° Celsius by 2030.

She stressed that promises of cooling later in the century ignore irreversible damage, including melting glaciers, collapsing ecosystems and lost lives.

“If the Himalayan glaciers melt,” she said, “they will not come back. We will live with the consequences forever.”

A man helps a woman after her car is stuck in waist-deep water. Globally, rainfall is more extreme due to the impacts of climate change.

A question of responsibility

Climate justice and development go hand in hand. Every fundamental right – from water and food to housing, mobility and electricity – requires energy.

“We believe that we can respond to the Sustainable Development Goals without changing the way the rich live. This does not work mathematically or ethically,” Professor Gupta explained.

His research shows that meeting basic human needs has a significant carbon footprint.

The research also highlights that since the planet has already exceeded safe limits, wealthy societies must reduce their emissions much more aggressively, not only to protect the climate, but also to create carbon space for others to assert their rights.

“Failure to do so turns inequalities into injustice. » she emphasized.

Climate change and displacement

Displacement is one of the most obvious effects of climate injustice. However, international law still does not recognize “climate refugees”.

Professor Gupta explains the progression clearly.

“Climate change first forces adaptation, for example by moving from water-intensive rice to drought-resistant crops. When adaptation fails, people absorb the losses: land, livelihoods, security. When survival itself becomes impossible, displacement begins,” she said.

“If the land becomes too dry to grow crops and there is no drinking water,” she said, “people are forced to leave.”

She added that most climate shifts today occur within countries or regions, not between continents.

“Moving is expensive, dangerous and often undesirable. The legal challenge is proving causation: did people leave because of climate change or because of other factors like poor governance or market failures?”

“This is where the science of attribution becomes crucial. New studies now compare decades of data to show when and how climate change alters precipitation, heat, health outcomes and extreme events. As this science advances, it may become possible to integrate climate displacement into international refugee law,” she noted.

“That,” she said, “will be the next step.” »

Africa’s children are among the most exposed to the impacts of climate change.

A broken legal framework

Professor Gupta said that addressing climate damage through human rights law is quite difficult due to the fragmented architecture of international law.

“This fragmentation allows states to compartmentalize responsibilities…They can say, ‘I accepted this here, but not there,’” she said.

“Environmental treaties, human rights conventions, trade agreements and investment regimes operate in parallel worlds. Countries can sign climate agreements without being bound by human rights treaties, or protect investors while ignoring environmental destruction,” she added.

She said this is why it is so difficult to invoke climate change as a global human rights violation. Until recently, climate damage was discussed in technical terms – parts per million of carbon dioxide, temperature targets, emission pathways – without explicitly asking: what does this do to humans?

Only recently has this started to change.

In a historic advisory opinion, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) clarified that climate change cannot be assessed in isolation. Courts and governments, the ICJ said, must consider climate obligations in conjunction with human rights and other environmental agreements.

For Professor Gupta, this legal change is long overdue but vital.

“He finally says to governments: we cannot talk about climate without talking about people.”

Climate change is transboundary

Assigning responsibility for climate change is exceptionally complex because its impacts cross borders, she said.

“For example, a Peruvian farmer sued a German company in a German court for damages caused by climate change. The court recognized that foreign plaintiffs can bring such suits, but proving the link between emissions and damages remains a major challenge. This case highlights the difficulties of holding states or companies accountable for cross-border climate-related human rights abuses,” she added.

Professor Gupta said the science of attribution helps link emissions to specific harms.

The ICJ has now affirmed that the continued use of fossil fuels may constitute an internationally wrongful act. States are responsible not only for their emissions, but also for regulating businesses within their borders.

“Different legal strategies are emerging, from lawsuits for corporate misrepresentations in the United States to France’s corporate vigilance law,” she added.

Vehicle emissions, diesel generators, biomass and waste burning have all contributed to poor air quality in Nigeria’s Lagos Lagoon. (2016 file)

Climate stability as a collective human right

Rather than considering climate as an individual right, Professor Gupta argues in favor of recognizing a collective right to a stable climate.

She explained that climate stability supports agriculture, water systems, supply chains and daily predictability, and that without it, society cannot function.

“Climate runs on water,” she said. “And water is at the heart of everything.”

Courts around the world are increasingly recognizing that climate instability infringes on existing human rights, even though climate itself is not yet codified as such.

This reflection is now echoed at the highest levels of the UN.

Erosion of fundamental rights

Speaking at the Human Rights Council in Geneva in June this year, UN High Commissioner Volker Türk warned that climate change was already eroding fundamental rights, particularly for the most vulnerable.

But he also presented climate action as an opportunity.

“Climate change can be a powerful lever for progress,” he said, if the world commits to a just transition away from environmentally destructive systems.

“What we need now,” he stressed, “is a roadmap to rethink our societies, our economies and our policies in an equitable and sustainable way.”

Political will, power and responsibility

“The erosion of multilateralism symbolized by the repeated withdrawals of the United States from Paris Agreement weakened global confidence. Meanwhile, 70 percent of the expansion of new fossil fuels is driven by four rich countries: the United States, Canada, Norway and Australia,” said Professor Gupta.

She argues that neoliberal ideology focused on markets, deregulation and individual freedom cannot solve a collective crisis.

“Climate change is a public good issue,” she said. “This requires rules, cooperation and strong states. »

Developing countries face a dilemma: wait for climate finance while emissions rise, or act independently and seek justice later. Waiting, she warns, is suicidal.

As the United Nations High Commissioner in Geneva concluded, a just transition must leave no one behind.

“If we fail to protect lives, health, jobs and the future,” Volker Türk warned, “we will reproduce the very injustices we claim to fight.”