The war in the Middle East is well into its fourth week and the humanitarian emergency it has sparked continues to be the focus of international attention, along with the energy crisis caused by attacks on shipping in key Strait of Hormuz and other oil and gas infrastructure in the Gulf region. Stay with us for live updates from across the UN system. App users can follow coverage here.
Toward a common liturgical celebration of the Feast of Creation
Church representatives discuss how September 1 observance can be elevated to a shared ecumenical commitment
(LWI) – Christian World Communions, ecumenical bodies, national churches and congregations have taken a major step in advancing a shared vision for elevating the annual Feast of Creation of 1 September to a liturgical feast. A recent webinar “A New Liturgical Feast, a Gift for the Third Millennium,” highlighted the significance of a unified observance of this feast for greater unity in Christian worship and ecological commitment.
Convened by an International Steering Committee, chaired by the World Council of Churches (WCC) and representing different church bodies, including The Lutheran World Federation (LWF), the 18 and 19 March webinar, brought together around 400 registered participants. The event provided a space to reflect on theological foundations, share practical experiences, and discern next steps toward establishing a common day of celebration.
The Feast of Creation has its roots in ancient Christian tradition, particularly within Orthodox churches, where September 1 has long been observed as a day marking the beginning of creation. In recent decades, at the invitation of the Orthodox Church, this tradition has expanded ecumenically, gaining recognition as the starting point of the annual Season of Creation, which runs until 4 October.
Since 2016, churches worldwide have increasingly embraced this broader season, supported by grassroots movements, theological reflection, and international dialogue. The current initiative seeks to deepen this momentum by encouraging churches to adopt a shared Feast of Creation—either on September 1 or on the nearest Sunday—so that Christians globally can celebrate together.
A range of materials was presented to support churches in adopting the Feast of Creation, including theological papers, liturgical guidance, and practical recommendations to assist churches at all levels—from global communions to local congregations—in integrating the feast into their liturgical calendars and common life. These included a joint letter signed by leaders of the LWF, Anglican Communion, World Communion of Reformed Churches, World Methodist Council, the WCC and the Middle East Council Churches presenting proposals from their ecumenical dialogues convened in Assisi since 2024. Inspired by the 2025 ecumenical celebration of the 1,700th anniversary of the Council of Nicaea, they described the possibility of a common liturgical feast of creation “as a precious opportunity for Christians of the new millennium to honor the Triune God as Creator and celebrate the great mystery of the creation of all things through Christ.”
How Fast Are Ukrainian Interceptor Drones, Now Defending the Middle East?
When the US and Israel attacked Iran at the end of February, Iran immediately retaliated by launching hundreds
NASA to Cover Progress 94 Spacecraft Launch, Space Station Docking
NASA will provide live coverage of the launch and docking of a Roscosmos cargo spacecraft carrying about three
How Open NASA Data on Comet 3I/ATLAS Will Power Tomorrow’s Discoveries
The interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS will soon leave our solar system, never to return, but the observations of the
Russians Destroyed a Sea Drone, but Whose Was It?
Ukrainian naval drones have inflicted serious losses on the Russian fleet, sinking several military vessels and striking port
Dignity, agency and justice for women on the move
In Colombia too, the LWF accompanies thousands of Venezuelan women and children seeking access to basic services such as protection, education and healthcare, said Johanna Morales, coordinator of the Migrant Pastoral office of the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Colombia. She noted that her country is home to one of the major migration routes across the American continent, currently hosting up to 3 million Venezuelan refugees.
Reflecting on the meaning of justice for women, she told the story of one young, pregnant mother with two small children who left Venezuela with her husband but was separated from him when they were stopped by one of the many armed groups in Colombia. Desperate to find him again, she accepted a lift from a truck driver, but during the upheaval she suffered a hemorrhage and had to stop at a health center where she lost the baby she was expecting.
By the time she arrived at the church office, Morales recalled, she was traumatized, unable to speak and unwilling to trust anyone. Recounting the support that her office provided – food, care for the children, a safe space to rest, non-judgmental listening and advice – Morales affirmed that “justice for women on the move is not just about laws and institutional perspectives.” Instead, “it means recognizing her dignity, listening to her stories, guaranteeing her protection and opportunities to rebuild her life, so that no woman on the move feels invisible or alone on her journey.”
Challenging anti-immigrant narratives in the United States
Kathy Parsons, Program Director of migration policy at the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) shared statistics on the sharp decline in numbers of refugees that the U.S. government is accepting – from around 100,000 in 2024 to just 7,500 in the current fiscal year. Refugee women who have already received resettled status in the U.S. are also not safe, she noted, as in recent months, many have been threatened with a “re-interviewing” process, alongside harassment, detention and even deportation back to the places from where they had escaped.
On a broader scale, she continued, “we’re seeing rhetoric from the highest levels of government that dehumanizes migrants and uses them as a scapegoat for all of society’s problems.” In the face of this ongoing erosion of the rights of migrants and refugees, Parsons said the ELCA has made “a whole church commitment to accompany vulnerable migrants and all who’ve been forcibly displaced.” This work is led by the AMMPARO program which provides protection, advocacy, representation, and opportunities for people on the move, at home and abroad in 19 countries around the globe.
In the U.S, she shared how this program partners with 277 congregations across the country that offer welcome, support and advocacy for migrants’ rights, enabling those congregations “to build alliances and connections within the faith community.” Alongside the practical, financial or legal support, she said the church is “working hard to challenge anti-immigrant narratives” and provide Bible– based resources focusing on the God-given dignity of every human being.
The panel also heard from Paddy Siyanga Knudsen, Lead Coordinator of the African Non-State Actors Platform on Migration and Development, which works to ensure that the voices of vulnerable women remain at the center of all migration policies. She shared many of the difficulties around intersectionality and the challenges of collecting accurate, detailed data about migrants, especially migrant women and children. “Identities are key,” she pointed out, “but labels are not everything,” as people’s identities may shift from refugee, to migrant, to permanent resident, to citizen and member of the diaspora in a new country.
In conclusion, moderator Batool Al-Taher, advocacy officer for LWF Jordan, reminded participants that “addressing legal barriers is not only about reforming laws or improving procedures. It is about ensuring dignity, agency and justice for all women whose lives are shaped by displacement and mobility.”
UK Faces Strategic Dilemma Amid US-Iran Tensions
The escalating conflict involving the United States and Israel against Iran has reached a critical juncture, with significant implications for international diplomacy and security. Recent provocations, including Israel’s strike on Iran’s South Pars gas field, have heightened tensions, drawing global attention to the potential for further escalation. Amidst these developments, there are calls for the UK to resist deeper involvement in what is increasingly seen as a conflict initiated by US President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
The current crisis stems from a series of aggressive actions by the US and Israel aimed at curbing what they perceive as Iran’s imminent nuclear threat. The situation intensified following Israel’s recent military strike on a key Iranian gas field, an act interpreted as a deliberate provocation to elicit a strong response from Iran. This move has not only escalated military tensions but also placed additional strain on diplomatic relations in the region.
US President Donald Trump has amassed what is described as one of the largest aggressive forces in modern history, yet finds himself isolated in his efforts to rally international support. Despite claiming victory in the conflict, Trump’s calls for allied support indicate a desire for validation and assistance in managing the fallout. Meanwhile, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu remains steadfast in his military strategy against Iran.
Amidst these developments, Britain’s involvement has come under scrutiny. Historically, the UK has been drawn into conflicts alongside its allies, often with significant political and human costs. Critics argue that Britain’s security interests are not directly threatened by this conflict and that involvement could lead to unintended consequences.
Despite these warnings, there are reports of senior British military planners being dispatched to Washington to aid in strategizing the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz—a critical chokepoint for global oil shipments—should diplomatic efforts fail. Additionally, British bases have been made available to US bombers under the guise of defensive purposes.
The term “strategic seduction” has been used to describe how nations like Britain can become entangled in foreign conflicts through gradual commitments and diplomatic pressures. This pattern mirrors past instances where Britain found itself deeply involved in conflicts such as those in Afghanistan and Iraq, often with limited strategic benefit and substantial human cost.
Trump’s rhetoric emphasizes a supposed debt owed by Britain for America’s role in NATO’s deterrence of Soviet Russia—a narrative used to justify current military alliances. However, this rationale is increasingly viewed as outdated and misaligned with contemporary security needs. Critics highlight that aerial bombardment and military aggression offer no sustainable solution to modern terrorism or regional instability.
The current situation presents a complex challenge for British foreign policy. Engaging further in this conflict risks repeating historical mistakes while potentially straining relations with other international partners who may view unilateral military actions unfavorably. Moreover, it raises questions about Britain’s role on the global stage—whether it will continue to follow allied powers into contentious conflicts or pursue an independent path prioritizing diplomatic resolutions.
The decision facing British leadership is not merely about immediate military strategy but also concerns broader geopolitical dynamics and Britain’s long-term strategic interests. As tensions continue to rise, it becomes imperative for Britain to weigh its options carefully, considering both historical lessons and future implications.
The unfolding crisis between the US-Israel alliance and Iran underscores the need for careful diplomatic engagement rather than hasty military action. For Britain, this moment serves as an opportunity to reassess its foreign policy priorities and commitments. By advocating for restraint and seeking peaceful resolutions through international dialogue, Britain can help de-escalate tensions while reaffirming its commitment to global stability and security.
As the situation evolves, all eyes will be on Britain’s next moves—whether it will heed calls for caution or risk deeper entanglement in a conflict not of its making. The coming weeks will be crucial in determining Britain’s stance on international military engagements and its role within the broader geopolitical landscape.
What to Do If You Need Healthcare Abroad in Europe
You’re on holiday, a work trip, or visiting family abroad — and suddenly something goes wrong. A sharp pain, an unexpected injury, or a medical emergency sends you looking for help in a country where you may not speak the language or understand the system.
In that moment, one question becomes urgent: Will I be treated — and who will pay for it?
Across the European Union, citizens are protected by a framework of cross-border healthcare rights. Whether you hold a European Health Insurance Card (EHIC) or need planned treatment abroad, EU law ensures access to necessary care — but the steps you take matter.
This is what to do if you need healthcare while in another European country.Data snapshot
* Over 200 million Europeans hold a European Health Insurance Card (EHIC).
* The EHIC covers medically necessary public healthcare during temporary stays in EU/EEA countries and Switzerland.
* Cross-border planned care is regulated under Directive 2011/24/EU.
* Patients can seek information and assistance through National Contact Points for cross-border healthcare.
Step 1: Use your EHIC for immediate care
If you need treatment during a temporary stay, present your European Health Insurance Card (EHIC) at a public healthcare provider.
This allows you to receive treatment under the same conditions and costs as residents of that country. In some countries, this means free care; in others, you may need to pay part of the cost.
If you do not have your card with you, you can request a Provisional Replacement Certificate from your national health authority.
Step 2: Understand what “medically necessary” means
The EHIC covers treatment that becomes necessary during your stay — not planned care. This includes:
- emergency treatment (accidents, urgent illness)
- treatment for chronic conditions (e.g. dialysis)
- care related to pregnancy or existing medical needs
Healthcare providers decide what is “medically necessary” based on your condition and the length of your stay.
Step 3: Keep receipts and documentation
In some countries, you may be asked to pay upfront. If this happens, keep all receipts, prescriptions, and medical reports.
You can later request reimbursement from your national health authority. Reimbursement is usually based on the cost of treatment in your home country.
Proper documentation is essential — without it, reimbursement may be delayed or refused.
Step 4: Know your rights for planned treatment abroad
If you travel specifically to receive medical treatment, different rules apply under EU law.
Under the Cross-Border Healthcare Directive, you may be entitled to:
- seek treatment in another EU country
- be reimbursed up to the cost of that treatment at home
- receive prior authorisation for certain hospital or specialised treatments
Each country has its own procedures, so it is important to check in advance.
Step 5: Contact support if something goes wrong
If you encounter problems — such as refusal of treatment, unexpected costs, or lack of information — you can contact your country’s National Contact Point.
These bodies are required under EU law to provide information about your rights and help resolve issues.
You may also find broader guidance in our article on healthcare access and rights for vulnerable groups in Europe, which explores how systems respond across borders.
The bottom line
Needing healthcare abroad can feel overwhelming, especially when you are far from home. But across Europe, your right to treatment does not stop at the border.
With the EHIC, cross-border healthcare rules, and national support systems, the framework is there — but it depends on knowing how to use it. Acting quickly, keeping records, and understanding your entitlements can make all the difference when it matters most.
World News in Brief: Rafah crossing reopens, gender inequality worsens global water crisis, rights defenders in Colombia
The World Health Organization (WHO) and its partners supported the medical evacuation of nine adult patients, most with trauma injuries, for treatment unavailable in Gaza.
OCHA said 18,000 patients in Gaza still urgently need treatment, while UN teams are preparing support for people returning through Egypt.
‘Major bottleneck’ in delivery of humanitarian supplies
“We need to be able to have rapid, safe and sustained and unimpeded access to be able to deliver assistance at scale and be able to scale up faster than we are doing,” OCHA Spokesperson Olga Cherevko said.
Aid officials also warned that Kerem Shalom remains the only operational crossing for incoming humanitarian and commercial supplies, creating a major bottleneck.
On Wednesday, three planned UN convoys were cancelled after Israeli authorities said only fuel would be allowed in, forcing agencies to leave food, fodder and other items behind.
Meanwhile, strikes reportedly hit residential areas in Gaza and the West Bank, causing casualties, according to UN humanitarian workers.
Gender inequality deepens global water crisis
A new UN report released on Thursday warns that the global water crisis is being made worse by deep-rooted gender inequality.
Across the world, women are responsible for collecting water in more than 70 per cent of rural households without a reliable supply, according to the report published by UN educational and cultural agency UNESCO ahead of World Water Day on 22 March.
“Water inequality has a strong gender dimension,” UNESCO Representative Bhanu Neupane told journalists at the United Nations in New York.
Climate change adding to inequalities
Across the world, women and girls spend an estimated 250 million hours every day fetching water. That is time they are prevented from going to school, paid work and other opportunities.
The report also highlights the impact of poor sanitation. In many places, women and girls still lack access to safe toilets and menstrual hygiene facilities, exposing them to shame, health risks and missed days of school or work.
The UN says climate change, water scarcity and disasters are making these inequalities worse. It is calling for urgent action to remove barriers to women’s equal access to water, land and services, and to ensure they are fully included in water governance and solutions.
Human rights defenders in Colombia face persistent deadly violence
Meanwhile in Colombia, human rights defenders have faced relentless violence over the past decade, with nearly 100 killed on average each year, according to a new report from the UN human rights office, OHCHR.
High Commissioner Volker Türk said it was “heartbreaking” that it remains one of the world’s deadliest countries for those defending human rights.
He acknowledged efforts by the current Government, including dialogue with civil society and work on a national protection policy, but warned that far more is needed.
Indigenous defenders disproportionately affected
The report says that between 2016 and 2025, the UN documented 972 killings of rights defenders. From 2022 to 2025 alone, 410 were killed, while more than 2,000 threats and attacks were recorded.
It links the violence to the continued presence of non-State armed groups, criminal networks involved in drug trafficking, illegal mining and logging, and weak state institutions. More than 70 per cent of perpetrators were believed to be non-State armed actors.
Indigenous defenders were disproportionately affected, accounting for 23 per cent of victims, despite making up less than five per cent of Colombia’s population.
The UN is urging urgent reforms to strengthen prevention, protection and criminal investigations, while warning that funding cuts have reduced its own ability to monitor abuses in high-risk areas.
